Turning website visitors into buyers - Online Funnel Part IV

by David on May 3, 2009

Getting them to come in the store...

Getting them to come in the store...

Presenting a product for purchase - moving your prospects from visitor mode to buyer mode.

For those sites that monetize by selling products this is often the most important step of the funnel. It is all well and good to have people read your helpful content and even to continue to engage with your site or newsletters on a regular basis. But while you want to grow an audience, you need at least a chunk of them to eventually convert or else the exercise is not commercial. Likewise, if you are ad supported, you need some level of demonstrable ROI to show your advertisers, unless they are just concerned with brand impressions, which is less and less common. So someone needs to click on something.

How do you get visitors to consider buying something and how do you measure it?

Some people will measure the conversion from relationships to customers as one big step. I prefer to break it down further to two steps (or even three): purchase consideration and store check out process. Each of these steps is measurable and is effected by different drivers. If optimization and revenue maximization is your goal, it helps to attack each step separately.

The first step is to get your relationship or visitor into the store or into the mode to think about buying your product. The key metric here is the visit to the store or product page, though some tactics skip this step all together and drive clicks directly to the shopping cart itself. The key tactic is to present the target with an offer. This can either be in reaction to users, such as displaying a special offer callout on a content page they are visiting, or can be proactive, such as sending the user an offer specific email.

In future posts, we will go into much greater detail on the strategy and tactics behind specific emails and broader communications approaches. There are a wide number of inputs that drive their success, from the frequency of touch, to the mix of content and commerce, to the specific types of offers you present and the creative you use to do so.

For today’s post, we will stay at a macro level and note the fact that the key aspect of conversion analysis here is to measure the effectiveness of tactics based on both the click through rate (CTR) they achieve, as well as the downstream metrics of orders/click and dollars/click. As we have said before, too keen a focus on the immediate metric (CTR) can lose the forrest for the trees. At the end of the day, it is all about the dollars that come from the activity. So do not stop your analysis between approaches at the one that produces the best CTR.

You can actually logically connect certain creative approaches to higher click through rates that have lower sales rates. Pitching something for free that actually has a cost is the clearest example. In so called “direct PPC” campaigns that focus on selling something immediately to those who click, driving down CTR can actually have a highly positive effect by focusing on those who are serious about buying something vs. those who never intended to buy, but were “just looking” or seeking a freebie. When you are paying for that click, you want a high ratio of buyers within clickers.

So if the key metric is visits to the store, which in turn is driven by CTR of site visitors or email readers, etc., what are the core drivers to effect that number? The main variables are within the offer or the pitch itself. What product are you offering? Do your prospects know the product? Where is the price point? Is it discounted? Are there special aspects beyond price, like free shipping? How are you describing the offer? What benefits are you presenting? What copy or visual creative are you using? Each of these elements can be tweaked and tested to optimize results.

Outside of the offer, what other factors drive success? How relevant is the offer to its context? In other words, does it match the content it sat next to? Displaying call-out ads on a site that relate to the content pages themselves will tend to have a much higher rate of engagement. If you run a home improvement site, ads for painting gear will generally drive better results sitting in the painting how-to section than generic home-improvement ads in their same spot. This sounds obvious, but it is amazing how many sites take a one size fits all approach.

In the next installment, we will finally examine the final step of the online conversion analysis funnel, the shopping cart and driving higher close ratios.

Photo by macmuc

Share and Enjoy:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • David
    Hi Brooks

    While I was focused on the "on page" and technical factors that drive the sales process, you are correct to point out that I did say, "it's all about the $$".

    Just as I would advocate testing dancing pandas if I thought they would have an impact on the end sales dollars, I would advocate testing the "human helper" and measuring the bottom line...OK maybe the human helper would have a greater likelihood of success...

    The most important part of the post, from my perspective, is that site owners need to not get caught up in intermediate metrics, but follow the influence of each factor all the way through to the dollars at the end.
  • Hi David,

    Excellent post. Actually, I've been following your series for a while - but haven't been compelled to comment until I read this one. You ask a very important question with "Outside of the offer, what other factors drive success?" I assume that you are referring to strategies and tactics related to applying technology exclusively (banners/ images/ the number of clicks to close/ look and feel of the cart itself) as opposed to including real human beings during the sales process.

    If you are, then I think you're missing a critical element in today's online sales cycle. Because more and more shoppers today WANT human interaction at critical decision moments. Without it, don't they tend to get "decision shyness?"

    I mean come on...wouldn't it be weird if you walked into the mall this weekend and there was NO ONE in ANY store to help you find what you're looking for? To help you decide on the best product for YOUR needs?

    We are in the middle of such a comparative test using Omniture's Test and Target application (among a few others) with one of our clients. The results are already very telling - clearly there are two kinds of buyers online - those those who want to be left alone to buy without assistance (be it additive technology or otherwise) and those who want and need help.

    What is particularly telling about the data we've collected is that those prospects who buy with the assistance of human interaction spend 1.5x to 2x MORE than those who purchase on their own. There are many conclusions one can draw from this positive result. However, the most important we've seen is that those sales are in effect NEW revenues - or "found money" that didn't exist before the introduction of consultative, customer-centric humans into the sales cycle. In other words, there is no "cannibalization" of revenue happening. The sales being produced with live sales support are incrementally new.

    We've validated this effect with a number of our clients, including a well known software publisher who is also in the Boston area - and have the data to prove it.

    The bottom line is that technology, fancy graphics and funnel management applications speak only to a certain type of online shopper. We've seen this effect repeatedly....but since your article is titled "turning visitors into buyers", I was compelled to write about the subject with the filter of this question: "What kind of visitors?"

    Isn't important to think about ALL the visitors, including those who are not buying because the "store" has no one around to help the shoppers?

    One would have to think you agree with this point based upon your statement that "At the end of the day, it is all about the dollars that come from the activity."

    Anyway, your article is well thought out and to the point. I look forward to reading and learning more from your excellent thinking in this series.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: The branding effect - indirect ROI and direct response programs.

Next post: Your social media voice - Be real!