Driving traffic to your website – Online Funnel Part II

Driving traffic to your website
Driving traffic to your website

The most basic answer to how we get more $ coming out of the bottom of the funnel is to add more people to the top. Driving more traffic is an obvious goal and it is often the focus of online marketing activities seeking the classic hockey stick graph depicting a steep climb in site visits.  For online conversion analysis, it is stop number one.

In fact it goes back to sales 101.  My first sales manager at Merrill Lynch a thousand years ago (ok, maybe not quite that long) used to say that you know how many people you have to speak with on average to get a prospect. If it takes 20 conversations to get a live prospect, you should be excited each time you get a “no” because you are 5% closer to “yes”. While this was mainly a tactic to help sales people overcome the negative impact of being told “no” all the time, it actually spoke to a more important aspect of sales in general. It takes large volumes of input to get a reasonable output. Back then it meant, “make more calls”. Now it means “drive more traffic”.

There are countless ways to drive traffic to your site or store.  Each one is measurable in its own way and each one has its advantages and disadvantages. We will drill into the specifics of each traffic driving tactic in later posts, but a non-exhaustive list in no particular  order includes such things as paid search (adwords, etc.), natural search, affiliate programs, social media, direct outreach through email, referred traffic from links, word-of-mouth and viral marketing, etc.

It should also be mentioned that “traffic” is not always measured as visits to a website. In a later post, I will discuss how online interactions and “touchpoints” are increasingly taking place off the site, through such points of interactions as embedded widgets, the reading of feeds, etc.

All website analytics packages give marketers visibility into the source of their traffic and help them track which of their traffic driving programs are yielding the best results for growth in visits. Where measurement becomes trickier is when you start to look at the impact increased traffic has on your downstream metrics. This is key.  It is not simply enough to focus on each step in the funnel as a separate and unrelated metric.  You cannot assume that new volumes of traffic from new sources or new campaigns will behave and convert as the previous flows did. If you are lucky enough to be in a business where your conversion rates are rock steady regardless of who walks in the door, lucky you. The reality is that different subsegments of visitors will behave very differently at each step in the funnel. Visitors driven by paid search will act differently across the search engines that send them, the keywords in the search, their own geography, etc.

The important lesson here is that even when focusing on step one in the funnel, marketers must follow new traffic flow all the way through the process to determine if the effort or expenditure is worth the cost in time or dollars. Now, don’t get me wrong. There are secondary benefits to site traffic beyond whether a specific visitor ultimately monetizes – growth in your brand recognition, potential referrals through word of mouth, additional links to your site, etc. But if you have limited resources and need a direct ROI on your investment, you can’t simply grow the top of the funnel without following each new segment through the whole process.

At the end of the day, online marketers should be able to calculate the cost of a given visit and match it up with the ultimate revenue over time driven by that visit. It is then that differences in business model have the biggest impacts on whether a given traffic driving campaign makes sense.  If you sell stuff and most transactions are one time events, you need to make that cost of acquisition fit in a very defined and limited range.  If your model drives recurring revenue (through subscriptions or upgrades, etc.) you can afford to spend more to acquire the first transaction and thus more on driving the original visit.

The big lesson is to measure your cost of traffic driving but consider the needs of your business before you determine if a campaign is worth the traffic it drives.

Of course, many “traffic driving” programs involve the need for content on your site. Whether it is creating “linkbait” for SEO or creating informative content to drive word of mouth or return visits, the user experience is part of what drives the traffic itself. Thus, looking at each step in the funnel is often a fuzzy exercise at best, since they are so intertwined.  In the next post in the series, we will look at the initial user experience as step two in the funnel.

Photo by flrnt.

Liveblogging makes conference attendance virtual and asynchronous!

Liveblogging conferences for virtual attendance
Liveblogging conferences for virtual attendance

More and more I am getting something out of all those great events that I am not able to attend due to time or expense. Occasionally events get covered in videos that are made public and posted to YouTube, but often there is no video available for events. For those events, there is often an industry blogger who covers the event by liveblogging from each session.

While some sessions are more easily covered than others, some bloggers do an amazing job of conveying both the gist and the details of presentations, questions and answers. I recently “virtually attended” SMX West by reading the excellent SMX West liveblogging coverage by Lisa Barone of Outspoken Media.

It’s not the same thing as being there (for one thing it is hard to network and chat with people by reading), but getting ideas and keeping abreast of trends is really possible. I also find that even though many of the presenters have blogs, they tend to organize their material differently in a presentation. If you are lucky enough to have them post their deck on slideshare or another such service, the liveblogging combines well to give you 90% of the idea flow.

Of course, my kitchen is not as exotic a place to consume this stuff as live in New York, San Fran, or Seattle, but it is way cheaper.

Photo by jimjarmo.

The Online Funnel – Part I

Online conversion analysis
Online conversion analysis

Any website or online business that exists for any purpose beyond self expression has a set of conversions that drive its success.  Just like any traditional sales process, online success can be measured as a series of conversions that resemble a funnel.  A large number of “targets” or “prospects” is driven into a process of steps that narrow their number down and down until the last remaining targets turn into whatever goal the driver has in mind…customers…users…readers, etc.

This process is often best represented as a funnel, with the large top section getting narrower and narrower with each step, as the pool of targets diminishes with the loss of those who did not “convert” from step to step. Some funnels are short and go right to the ultimate end conversion.  Others are taller and multi-stepped, with a more gradual buildup of connection between the user and the site, service, or product.

Why is this important? Well one of the best things about online marketing is the ability to measure success quantitatively and adjust your approach to improve results. When your task is something as large as turning the denizens of the wider internet into customers for your product or service, that is not a single conversion or a single measurement. Rather, most strategies involve many steps and inputs, each of which can be optimized for its greatest contribution to ultimate success.  Funnel analysis is a very useful way of breaking down a complex set of drivers into ultimate success and examining the success of each factor. When comparing the metrics for each step to industry standards and to themselves over time or under one approach versus another, online marketers gain a framework for doing their work, applying scarce resources, and seeing where they might have the biggest impact by applying change.

This is the first in a series of posts that will examine the various steps of the online funnel, the metrics that are generally measured for each step, and the tactics that are employed at each step. There are as many different funnels as there are businesses or site publishers on the internet.  For our purposes however, we will look at the funnel as consisting of four primary stages prior to ultimate monetization:

1. Traffic driving
2. User engagement
3. Relationship building
4. Monetization events (AKA Purchase decisions)

In its most basic framework, this involves single conversion metrics leading from step to step.

1. Converting measures of traffic to some action on a site or using a service.
2. Moving from a single interaction to a repeated one.
3. Moving from a set of interactions to the consideration of a purchase (for example).
4. Consummating monetization (through a purchase, click-through, or otherwise).

In our next post in the series, we will look at the tactics used in the first funnel step, driving traffic, and the drivers and metrics that lead to conversion from that step to measuring the movement to the second funnel step, user engagement.

Image adapted from original by Normann Copenhagen.

How is Twitter changing the nature of search?

I have recently started using Twitter a lot more.  I tweet every so often but I also regularly follow some Twitter affecting searchpeople that have smart things to say.  What I have noticed though is the degree to which people are starting to share links to content on the web through Twitter. More precisely, I have noticed the degree to which there seems to be a shift away from blogging to share stuff and toward tweeting a tinyurl of it.  Microblogging through Twitter or Tumblr, etc. seems tailor made for this form of “conversation” of callouts to cool and interesting things. Many of the people whose blogs I follow have definitely shifted their behavior to use Twitter more often and are posting more links there.

Blogs seem to be reserved now for more thoughtful analyses and longer expressions of ideas.  To be sure, these posts still have links, but I would really like to see a study of whether their volume of links has declined over time.

Why is this an issue?  Well mainly because the prime way people find stuff on the net, Google, is focused on determining contextual value and authority for certain topics based on the links connected to web pages.  If the “linkerati” are increasingly doing their linking on microblogging platforms whose links are no-followed, where will this leave the value of the google index?

At least some of the small url services, like http://zi.ma, are providing link love value by providing 301 redirects in their urls so that when people just copy the small urls from Twitter and paste them in their blog, there will some value passed to the target page.  But as the “net” disperses from traditional “pages” into other forms like tweets, where will this leave search?  Where will it leave the link focused algorithm? I don’t have the answers yet, but it would be great to hear someone else asking or starting to answer the question…

Search and the exchange model: are exchanges making a comeback?

The other day, I found a new site for food artisans to sell their wares called foodzie.com (great name!).  It’s description, echoed by lots of people around the web, is that it is the “etsy” of artisan food.  Etsy.com, for those who don’t know, is a place where artists can sell their hand crafted items.  It is an exchange for crafts and hand made gifts and it has grown by leaps and bounds.  Well foodzie is much the same thing…a place to bring the buyers and sellers of artisan foods together.

Some of my not so many readers will know that I founded a company in the early 90s (about a year before eBay) based on the exchange model.  We were too early, earlier than eBay, we focused on areas that were less broad than eBay, and we didn’t execute anywhere nearly as well.  But the exchange concept was a big hit and continued to be through the ensuing years.  While many vertical exchanges, especially B2B ones like Chemdex.com, came crashing down, broader exchanges like eBay continued to flourish.

A few years ago I wrote a post on my personal blog about the shift in bringing buyers and sellers together that was taking place in moving from exchanges to search.  The value provided by exchanges was always the bringing the buyers to the sellers.  Sellers made their stuff available and buyers knew where to come and get it.  Search started to change that.  Just by entering the name of the thing you were seeking into google you could find people who had it to sell.  You could argue that adwords and SEO replaced exchange listings as the best way to reach buyers.  Vertical search engines started popping up as well…with sites like Kayak for travel and Indeed for jobs.

So with the launch of new sites like Etsy and Foodzie, does that suggest that exchanges are making a comeback?  Are buyers able to find things in relevant search results or do they need aggregators in the form of exchanges to make the “stuff” they seek easily accessible.?  I think the key in answering the question comes from what people feel gives them the best “search results” when they are looking for the thing…if something is unique or isn’t suited well to broader search engines results, than people will flock to the places that provide a better experience in getting to the thing they want.  Sometimes that comes from providing semantic context around a search and a topic specific ranking algorithm.  Sometimes that will come from leading enough vendors to set up a virtual stall in a place that draws visitors based on that aggregation.  My guess is that we will ebb and flow but that both exchanges and search engines will continue to be in the mix.

Why blog here?

Those who know me well also know that I have blogged in the past. When I was blogging semi-regularly at liberty egg, one of the things that I often struggled with was how to balance work or professional thinking and writing with personal posting. If I want to build a set of posts that reflect my professional work, do I really want to post pictures of my kids in the same place? Likewise, do all of my friends and family care about the nuances of online marketing?

So as I was thinking about creating and managing my online profile, it occurred to me that I needed more than one place online to post my thoughts and think out loud. So this place will now be where I talk about those things I deal with professionally – marketing, the web, technology, and how businesses are creating a new economic model. Exciting stuff for me. If it’s not exciting for you and you are here for my personal life or thoughts, go to liberty egg where I will rebuilding my personal blog soon.